BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Yakar M. Letter to the Editor: Imaging biomarkers in rectal cancer - are we ready for clinical implementation? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(10): 120231 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.120231]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the editorial team and reviewers of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology for their efforts throughout the publication process. The editorial and peer-review procedures were professionally managed, and the journal provides a valuable platform for scientific communication and the dissemination of clinically relevant research. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the academic discussion on imaging biomarkers in rectal cancer and wish the journal continued success in promoting high-quality scientific publications.